Building movement is often a complex, and scary consideration when designing a building. Get it wrong and it could be very costly! One famous (and expensive) example of this is the Guggenheim museum in New York. The Architect (Frank Lloyd Wright) didn’t install expansion joints, leading to a $29million restoration project back in 2007! Yikes!
So, to help you along the way we thought we would take the time to explain the different ways building movement can be conveyed so that when you come across it, or have to do something with it, you understand what you’re looking at.
So, lets take a look at a simple approach to joint movement:
So, with those figures you can calculate the amount of movement that’s going to occur, but how do you express that movement?
Anticipated movement can either be expressed as a total or overall movement, as a percentage of the expansion joint width or, more usually, as a +/- movement.
There is no right way to do it, different architects, engineers and manufacturers express it in different ways, but it’s important to understand what each one means. If you interpret it wrongly it could be very costly!
So, there you have it, that’s how building movement can be expressed. As we said before, there’s no right or wrong way of doing it, each Architect, Expansion Joint Manufacturer or Structural Engineer will express it differently. We’ve hopefully just shown you how to interpret it.
If you need help with your building movement get in touch. We’ve been solving complex building movement issues for many years, and have a wealth of knowledge and expertise available at your disposal.
Slideshare Summary Click Here
How Building Movement is Expressed from mikehearle
Filed Under: Blog
Tagged With: building movement, Expansion Joint Covers
Australia
Hong Kong SAR
Indonesia
Malaysia
New Zealand
Philippines
Singapore
